5146
at the proper time. I shall report
upon W. May's case.
4
regards the China
As regards
Mail" which has been less my
–
organ than Mr Anstey ' - and of whose " dull libels" he now complains the "China Mail supplied the original materials ( furnished as it afterwards appeared by Mr May) which formed the sandy foundation upon which
Mr Anstey caused his superstructure
of vituperation. The "Erina Mail"
has undoubtedly changed
lone towards and its opinion of
Wrbaldwell and has honestly
avowed the ch
it
change,
but under
no influence of mine.
مجھ
with respect to the
Ala-kow-long paperis - so
unfortunately destroyed it.
hinted at
never tous averred, or
to my knowledge during their
existence that they contained
Any thing Coimimatory of Mvrün
baldwell, and it was after their
being buint (which I deem a
Misfortune for Mrbaldeocit
beiro no more
great
he
cognizant of the burning, than I was for many
loeeks after the act ) that Abr
Anstey and Mr May so boldly
proclaim "The Evidence was there!
"It
was an Act of spoliation ! " Every thing is to presumed against the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.